Panhandle Health District

                                                            8500 N. Atlas Road         Hayden, Idaho  83835

www.phd1.idaho.gov

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                      Date:     February 17, 2010                     

Contact:                                                                             Released by: Jeanne Bock, Director                     

Cynthia Taggart

Public Information Officer

(208) 415-5108

(208) 818-7288 (cell)

 

Study Shows Idaho’s Panhandle Could Be Healthier

 

Hayden – A new study out of the University of Wisconsin that ranks Idaho’s counties according to a variety of factors that determine health shows that counties in the Panhandle with the most people rank as healthier places overall to live.

              Kootenai and Bonner counties rank in the top third of all Idaho’s counties in about half of the eight major categories compared. Neither county ranks in the bottom third in any category. Boundary, Benewah and Shoshone counties rank in the bottom third of all counties in Idaho in at least half the categories.

              Forty-two of 44 Idaho counties were included in the study. Not enough information was available from Camas and Clark counties.

              Strengths and weaknesses vary by county, ranging from health behaviors that include tobacco use and unsafe sex to a high number of babies born with low weights and residents who lack health insurance or access to health care.

              “The information is no surprise. It comes from reports that health districts submit and others we study to plan programs to improve health in our counties,” said Jeanne Bock, director of the Panhandle Health District. “But the way it’s presented shows that improving overall health takes more than health districts. It requires government, education, law enforcement—a whole community effort. Hopefully this assessment will start the ball rolling toward improvements for everyone.”

              The report, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is the first to rank health environments for nearly every county in the nation. It compares counties within their states, but does not compare them to counties in other states. The online report is available at www.countyhealthrankings.org.

               The county health assessments were undertaken to motivate communities to work together toward improvements. The Wisconsin Population Health Institute has conducted a similar survey in Wisconsin since 2003.

              The Idaho rankings are germane only to Idaho. A bottom ranking doesn’t mean a county is unhealthy. It means that overall healthy living, as defined by this report, is harder to achieve in some counties than others. Rankings may be due to such unchanging factors as a small population or geographic isolation.

              The areas compared include the following factors: death before age 75; low-weight births; number of sick days; how many people describe their physical and/or mental health as fair or poor; tobacco use; diet and exercise; alcohol use; unsafe sex; access to health care; quality of care; education; employment; income; family and social support; community safety; air quality; access to health food and liquor stores.

              A chart of the rankings for northern Idaho is below, but here are a few interesting findings:

 

           The report provides counties with a starting point from which to measure improvements. It will provide comparable data for three more years. The study also identifies who’s successful in certain areas so other counties can learn from them.

           “We’re less concerned with how we compare to other parts of the state than with what we can learn from each other to make our counties healthier,” Bock said.

 

County Health Rankings

Category

Benewah

Bonner

Boundary

Kootenai

Shoshone

Mortality – premature death before age 75

12th

25th

41st

11th

34th

Morbidity – self-reported health; sick days; % of low birth weights

35th

11th

4th

13th

40th

Tobacco use; diet and exercise; alcohol use; unsafe sex

35th

13th

25th

18th

40th

Clinical Care – access to care; quality of care

26th

13th

5th

3rd

12th

Education; employment; income; family and social support; community safety

42nd

28th

39th

17th

40th

Physical Environment – air quality; access to healthy foods; liquor stores

28th

29th

37th

18th

30th

Overall Health Outcomes – mortality and morbidity

23rd

16th

34th

9th

40th

Overall Health Factors – health behaviors; clinical care; social economic factors; environment

42nd

18th

30th

12th

41st